Application Domains

cloud computingCloud / Edge / Fog Computing

My cloud computing research combines security modelling with empirical investigation of the organisational challenges cloud adoption presents. An early contribution developed a combined system and attacker model for infrastructure clouds that enables customers to construct and reason about attack scenarios across the blurred boundary between insiders and outsiders. Subsequent work examined empirically how German organisations actually choose cloud providers — finding compliance rather than security to be the dominant driver — and proposed a CAIQ-based multi-criteria approach to make provider comparisons tractable. A more recent contribution addresses data protection by design in connected vehicle cloud ecosystems, using attribute-based encryption to technically enforce GDPR purpose limitation.
Show related bibliography:
  1. Syed-Winkler, S.; Pape, S. and Sabouri, A.: A Data Protection-Oriented System Model Enforcing Purpose Limitation for Connected Mobility. In CSCS '22: ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium, Ingolstadt, Germany, December 8th, 2022, ACM, 2022.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract SPS22cscsBibtexprivacypetsautomotivecloud computingautopsy

  2. Pape, S.: Requirements Engineering and Tool-Support for Security and Privacy.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLink Abstract Pape20habilBibtexprivacysecurityhuman factorspetssecurity managementserious gamesocial engineeringcloud computingioteconomylawpsychology

  3. Pape, S.; Paci, F.; Juerjens, J. and Massacci, F.: Selecting a Secure Cloud Provider: An Empirical Study and Multi Criteria Approach. In Information, 11 (5), 2020.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PPJM20informationBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcloud computingcloudatcs4eseconomics

  4. Pape, S. and Stankovic, J.: An Insight into Decisive Factors in Cloud Provider Selection with a Focus on Security. In Computer Security - ESORICS 2019 International Workshops, CyberICPS, SECPRE, SPOSE, ADIoT, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg, September 26-27, 2019, Revised Selected Papers, pages 287-306, Springer International Publishing, Cham, LNCS 11980, 2019.
    PDFPresentation slidesDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PS19sposeBibtexinformation systemssecuritysecurity managementcloud computing

  5. Pape, S. and Rannenberg, K.: Applying Privacy Patterns to the Internet of Things' (IoT) Architecture. In Mobile Networks and Applications (MONET) -- The Journal of SPECIAL ISSUES on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing, 24 (3): 925-933, 2019.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PR19monetBibtexprivacysoftware engineeringpetscloud computingiot

  6. Bleikertz, S.; Mastelic, T.; Pape, S.; Pieters, W. and Dimkov, T.: Defining the Cloud Battlefield -- Supporting Security Assessments by Cloud Customers. In Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Cloud Engineering (IC2E), pages 78-87, 2013, Acceptance rate: 22 / 107 = 20.6%.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract BMPPD13ic2eBibtexsecuritycloud computingsecureclouds

iotInternet of Things (IoT)

My IoT research addresses privacy engineering at the architectural level and the adequacy of privacy governance across connected devices. A foundational contribution maps established software privacy patterns onto the layered IoT / fog / cloud architecture, showing how the edge layer can host meaningful privacy controls close to the data source, illustrated with a smart vehicles scenario. Empirically, an assessment of 110 IoT devices against a GDPR-derived framework showed that most privacy policies are inadequate to satisfy regulatory requirements. Further work investigates social factors shaping adoption of privacy-sensitive IoT services — including contact tracing apps — and analyses the specific privacy threats and pattern gaps that arise in next-generation use cases such as robotaxis.
Show related bibliography:
  1. Al-Momani, A.; Balenson, D.; Mann, Z. &.; Pape, S.; Petit, J. and Bösch, C.: Navigating Privacy Patterns in the Era of Robotaxis. In IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW) 2024, International Workshop on Privacy Engineering (IWPE) 2024, pages 32-39, 2024.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract ABMPPB24iwpeBibtexprivacypetsautomotiveiotautopsy

  2. Sadeghi, A.; Pape, S. and Harborth, D.: The impact of individuals' social environments on contact tracing app use: Survey Study. In JMIR Human Factors, 10:e45825, 2023.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkno Link Abstract SPH23jmirhfBibtexhuman factorsiotcs4e

  3. Bracamonte, V.; Pape, S. and Löbner, S.: "All apps do this": Comparing Privacy Concerns Towards Privacy Tools and Non-Privacy Tools for Social Media Content. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PoPETs), 2022 (3): 57-78, 2022.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract BPL22petsBibtexprivacyhuman factorsiotmachine learningcs4e

  4. Kröger, J. L.; Gellrich, L.; Pape, S.; Brause, S. R. and Ullrich, S.: Personal Information Inference from Voice Recordings: User Awareness and Privacy Concerns. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PoPETs), 2022 (1): 6-27, 2022.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract KGPBU22petsBibtexprivacyhuman factorsiotmachine learning

  5. Pape, S.: Requirements Engineering and Tool-Support for Security and Privacy.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLink Abstract Pape20habilBibtexprivacysecurityhuman factorspetssecurity managementserious gamesocial engineeringcloud computingioteconomylawpsychology

  6. Pape, S. and Rannenberg, K.: Applying Privacy Patterns to the Internet of Things' (IoT) Architecture. In Mobile Networks and Applications (MONET) -- The Journal of SPECIAL ISSUES on Mobility of Systems, Users, Data and Computing, 24 (3): 925-933, 2019.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PR19monetBibtexprivacysoftware engineeringpetscloud computingiot

  7. Paul, N.; Tesfay, W. B.; Kipker, D-K.; Stelter, M. and Pape, S.: Assessing Privacy Policies of Internet of Things Services. In ICT Systems Security and Privacy Protection - 33rd IFIP TC 11 International Conference, SEC 2018, Held at the 24th IFIP World Computer Congress, WCC 2018, Poznan, Poland, September 18-20, 2018, Proceedings, pages 156-169, 2018, Acceptance rate: 27 / 89 = 30.3%.
    PDFPresentation slidesDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PTKSP18ifipsecBibtexprivacyiotlawanon

automotiveAutomotive

The automotive strand is a sustained line of work on privacy engineering for connected and autonomous vehicles. The work produced a series of complementary artefacts: a system model for the automotive domain identifying suitable locations for PETs, a purpose-limitation enforcement mechanism using attribute-based encryption, a privacy manager component for runtime control of in-vehicle data flows, and a GDPR-grounded PET selection framework — all integrated into the AUTOPSY project framework and validated on a location-based services demonstrator. A parallel thread critically evaluates existing PET selection methods against a realistic robotaxi use case, exposing significant shortcomings and providing concrete recommendations for methodology development.
Show related bibliography:
  1. Syed-Winkler, S.; Krauss, C.; Pape, S. and Stöttinger, M.: Datenschutz durch Technik -- Datenschutzfördernde Technologien im automobilen Kontext. In Datenschutz und Datensicherheit (dud), 50 (2): 82-87, 2026.
    DOILinkLinkLink Abstract SKPS26dudBibtexprivacypetsautomotive

  2. Al-Momani, A.; Balenson, D.; Bösch, C.; Mann, Z. A.; Pape, S. and Petit, J.: Lessons from a Robotaxi: Challenges in Selecting Privacy-Enhancing Technologies. In ESORICS 2025 International Workshops - DPM, pages 154-170, Springer, Cham, LNCS 16231, 2025.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkno Link Abstract ABBMPP25dpmBibtexprivacypetsautomotiveautopsy

  3. Pape, S.; Bkakria, A.; Chah, B.; Heymann, M. and Winkler, S. S.: A Framework for Supporting PET Selection Based on GDPR Principles. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2025, Ghent, Belgium, 11 August 2025 - 14 August 2025, pages 3-23, Springer, Cham, LNCS 15992, 2025.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PBCHS25aresBibtexprivacypetsautomotiveautopsy

  4. Pape, S.; Bkakria, A.; Heymann, M.; Chah, B.; Abbas-Turki, A.; Syed-Winkler, S.; Hiller, M. and Yaich, R.: AUTOPSY: A Framework for Tackling Privacy Challenges in the Automotive Industry., 2025.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PBHCASHY25arxivBibtexprivacypetsautomotiveautopsy

  5. Al-Momani, A.; Balenson, D.; Mann, Z. &.; Pape, S.; Petit, J. and Bösch, C.: Navigating Privacy Patterns in the Era of Robotaxis. In IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW) 2024, International Workshop on Privacy Engineering (IWPE) 2024, pages 32-39, 2024.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract ABMPPB24iwpeBibtexprivacypetsautomotiveiotautopsy

  6. Pape, S.; Syed-Winkler, S.; Garcia, A. M.; Chah, B.; Bkakria, A.; Hiller, M.; Walcher, T.; Lombard, A.; Abbas-Turki, A. and Yaich, R.: A Systematic Approach for Automotive Privacy Management. In CSCS '23: ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium, Darmstadt, Germany, December 5th, 2023, ACM, 2023.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PSGCBHWLAY23cscsBibtexprivacypetsautomotiveautopsy

  7. Rannenberg, K.; Pape, S.; Tronnier, F. and Löbner, S.: Study on the technical evaluation of decentralization based de-identification procedures for personal data in the automotive sector. Technical Report 371, Forschungsvereinigung Automobiltechnik e.V. (FAT), 2023.
    DOILinkLinkno Link Abstract RPTL23fatBibtexprivacypetsautomotive

  8. Syed-Winkler, S.; Pape, S. and Sabouri, A.: A Data Protection-Oriented System Model Enforcing Purpose Limitation for Connected Mobility. In CSCS '22: ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium, Ingolstadt, Germany, December 8th, 2022, ACM, 2022.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract SPS22cscsBibtexprivacypetsautomotivecloud computingautopsy

  9. Löbner, S.; Tronnier, F.; Pape, S. and Rannenberg, K.: Comparison of De-Identification Techniques for Privacy Preserving Data Analysis in Vehicular Data Sharing. In CSCS '21: ACM Computer Science in Cars Symposium, Ingolstadt, Germany, November 30th, 2021, pages 7:1-7:11, ACM, 2021.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract LTPR21cscsBibtexprivacypetsautomotive

  10. Rannenberg, K.; Pape, S.; Tronnier, F. and Löbner, S.: Study on the Technical Evaluation of De-Identification Procedures for Personal Data in the Automotive Sector. Technical Report, Goethe University Frankfurt, 2021.
    PDFDOILinkLinkno Link Abstract RPTL21trBibtexprivacypetsautomotive

machine learningMachine Learning

My machine learning research focuses on the intersection of privacy and user-centred AI design. Contributions include an explainable ML model for predicting appropriate default privacy settings in line with GDPR interpretability requirements, and a framework — grounded in expert input — that maps Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning (PPML) techniques (differential privacy, federated learning, secure multiparty computation) to user acceptance criteria, enabling privacy-by-design choices that reflect what users actually value. A separate thread examines the user perspective on AI transparency: an experiment on AI model cards reveals a usability–trustworthiness trade-off in disclosure design, while a large-scale analysis of generative AI app reviews finds that real users' concerns centre on validity and safety rather than privacy, pointing to a significant awareness gap.
Show related bibliography:
  1. Bracamonte, V.; Loebner, S.; Tronnier, F.; Lieberknecht, A-K. and Pape, S.: User Issues and Concerns in Generative AI: A Mixed-Methods Analysis of App Reviews. In 8th International Conference on Computer-Human Interaction Research and Applications (CHIRA 2024) (poster), 2024, Best poster award.
    PDFPosterDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract BLTLP24chiraBibtexprivacymachine learning

  2. Löbner, S.; Pape, S.; Bracamonte, V. and Phalakarn, K.: Which PPML Would a User Choose? A Structured Decision Support Framework for Developers to Rank PPML Techniques Based on User Acceptance Criteria., 2024.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract LPBP24arxivBibtexprivacyhuman factorspetsmachine learning

  3. Bracamonte, V.; Pape, S.; Löbner, S. and Tronnier, F.: Effectiveness and Information Quality Perception of an AI Model Card: A Study Among Non-Experts. In 20th Annual International Conference on Privacy, Security & Trust (PST 2023), Copenhagen, Denmark, 21-23 August, 2023.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract BPLT23pstBibtexhuman factorsmachine learning

  4. Löbner, S.; Pape, S. and Bracamonte, V.: User Acceptance Criteria for Privacy Preserving Machine Learning Techniques. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, ARES 2023, Benevento, Italy, 29 August 2023- 1 September 2023, pages 149:1-149:8, ACM, 2023, 20th International Workshop on Trust, Privacy and Security in the Digital Society.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract LPB23trustbusBibtexprivacyhuman factorspetsmachine learningcs4e

  5. Bracamonte, V.; Pape, S. and Löbner, S.: "All apps do this": Comparing Privacy Concerns Towards Privacy Tools and Non-Privacy Tools for Social Media Content. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PoPETs), 2022 (3): 57-78, 2022.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract BPL22petsBibtexprivacyhuman factorsiotmachine learningcs4e

  6. Kröger, J. L.; Gellrich, L.; Pape, S.; Brause, S. R. and Ullrich, S.: Personal Information Inference from Voice Recordings: User Awareness and Privacy Concerns. In Proceedings on Privacy Enhancing Technologies (PoPETs), 2022 (1): 6-27, 2022.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract KGPBU22petsBibtexprivacyhuman factorsiotmachine learning

  7. Löbner, S.; Tesfay, W. B.; Nakamura, T. and Pape, S.: Explainable Machine Learning for Default Privacy Setting Prediction. In IEEE Access, 9: 63700-63717, 2021.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract LTNP21accessBibtexprivacymachine learningcs4e

  8. Bracamonte, V.; Pape, S. and Kiyomoto, S.: Investigating User Intention to Use a Privacy Sensitive Information Detection Tool., 2021.
    PDFDOILinkLinkno Link Abstract BPK21SCISBibtexprivacyhuman factorsmachine learning

arAugmented Reality

My AR research uses Pokémon Go — a rare example of a mainstream AR app with millions of real-world users — as a living laboratory to investigate both technology acceptance and privacy concerns in mobile augmented reality. Studies employing the UTAUT2 model identify hedonic motivation as the dominant adoption driver, while an extension incorporating childhood brand nostalgia reveals that brand-induced positivity can substantially bias privacy risk calculus. A complementary large-scale vignette experiment (n=1,100) on mobile AR privacy finds that permission sensitivity and prior download count drive user concern, with AR-specific contextual factors playing a smaller role than expected — providing practical guidance for developers and regulators.
Show related bibliography:
  1. Harborth, D. and Pape, S.: Investigating Privacy Concerns Related to Mobile Augmented Reality Apps - A Vignette Based Online Experiment. In Computers in Human Behavior, 122, 2021.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract HP21chbBibtexprivacyhuman factorsarpsychologycs4e

  2. Harborth, D. and Pape, S.: Investigating Privacy Concerns related to Mobile Augmented Reality Applications. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Information Systems ICIS 2019, Munich, Germany, December 13-15, 2019, 2019.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract HP19icisBibtexinformation systemsprivacyhuman factorsar

  3. Harborth, D. and Pape, S.: How Nostalgic Feelings Impact Pokémon Go Players - Integrating Childhood Brand Nostalgia into the Technology Acceptance Theory. In Behaviour & Information Technology, 39 (12): 1276-1296, 2019.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract HP19bitBibtexinformation systemshuman factorsarpsychologyanon

  4. Harborth, D. and Pape, S.: Privacy Concerns and Behavior of Pokémon Go Players in Germany. In Privacy and Identity Management. The Smart Revolution - 12th IFIP WG 9.2, 9.5, 9.6/11.7, 11.6/SIG 9.2.2 International Summer School, Ispra, Italy, September 4-8, 2017, Revised Selected Papers, pages 314-329, Springer International Publishing, IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology 526, 2017.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract HP17ifipscBibtexinformation systemsprivacyhuman factorspetsarpsychologyanon

  5. Harborth, D. and Pape, S.: Age Matters - Privacy Concerns of Pokémon Go Players in Germany (Extended Abstract)., 2017.
    PDFDOILinkno Link Abstract HP17ifipsc_eaBibtexinformation systemsprivacyhuman factorsarpsychology

  6. Harborth, D. and Pape, S.: Exploring the Hype: Investigating Technology Acceptance Factors of Pokémon Go. In 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality, ISMAR 2017, Nantes, France, October 9-13, 2017, pages 155-168, 2017, Acceptance rate: (17)/99 = 17.2 %.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract HP17ismarBibtexinformation systemshuman factorsarpsychology

critical infrastructuresCritical Infrastructures

Much of my critical infrastructure work was conducted within the SIDATE project, a collaboration with small and medium-sized German energy providers responding to new KRITIS legislation that mandated IT security certification. The research spans the full practical lifecycle: eliciting requirements for an inter-organisational IT security management platform, tracking ISMS adoption through two longitudinal surveys — finding that regulatory pressure successfully increased both adoption rates and perceived security — and contributing attack tree modelling tools and lightweight risk assessment frameworks to support security assessments in complex infrastructure environments.
Show related bibliography:
  1. Schmitz, C.; Sekulla, A. and Pape, S.: Asset-centric analysis and visualisation of attack trees. In Graphical Models for Security - 7th International Workshop, GraMSec@CSF 2020, Boston, MA, USA, Virtual Conference, June 22, 2020, Revised Selected Papers, pages 45-64, Springer, LNCS 12419, 2020.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract SSP20gramsecBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructurescs4e

  2. Pape, S.; Schmitz, C.; Kipker, D-K. and Sekula, A.: On the use of Information Security Management Systems by German Energy Providers. In Presented at the Fourteenth IFIP Working Group 11.10 International Conference on Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2020.
    PDFPresentation slidesDOIno Link Abstract PSKS20iccipBibtexinformation systemssecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructureslawcs4esidate

  3. Schmitz, C. and Pape, S.: LiSRA: Lightweight Security Risk Assessment for Decision Support in Information Security. In Computers & Security, 90, 2020.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract SP20coseBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

  4. Sekulla, A.; Schmitz, C.; Pape, S. and Pipek, V.: Demonstrator zur Beschreibung und Visualisierung einer kritischen Infrastruktur. In Human Practice. Digital Ecologies. Our Future. 14. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (WI 2019), February 24-27, 2019, Siegen, Germany, pages 1978, 2019.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract SSPP19wiBibtexsecuritycritical infrastructuressidate

  5. Pape, S.; Pipek, V.; Rannenberg, K.; Schmitz, C.; Sekulla, A. and Terhaag, F.: Stand zur IT-Sicherheit deutscher Stromnetzbetreiber : technischer Bericht. Technical Report, Universität Siegen, 2018.
    PDFDOILinkno Link Abstract PPRSST18trBibtexsecuritycritical infrastructuressidate

  6. Dax, J.; Hamburg, D.; Pape, S.; Pipek, V.; Rannenberg, K.; Schmitz, C.; Sekulla, A. and Terhaag, F.: Sichere Informationsnetze bei kleinen und mittleren Energieversorgern (SIDATE). In State of the Art: IT-Sicherheit für Kritische Infrastrukturen, pages 29, Universität der Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, 2018.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkno LinkBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

  7. Dax, J.; Ley, B.; Pape, S.; Pipek, V.; Rannenberg, K.; Schmitz, C. and Sekulla, A.: Stand der IT-Sicherheit bei deutschen Stromnetzbetreibern. In State of the Art: IT-Sicherheit für Kritische Infrastrukturen, pages 69-74, Universität der Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, 2018.
    PDFDOILinkLinkno LinkBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

  8. Dax, J.; Pape, S.; Pipek, V.; Rannenberg, K.; Schmitz, C.; Sekulla, A. and Terhaag, F.: Das SIDATE-Portal im Einsatz. In State of the Art: IT-Sicherheit für Kritische Infrastrukturen, pages 145-150, Universität der Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, 2018.
    PDFDOILinkno LinkBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

  9. Hamburg, D.; Niephaus, T.; Noll, W.; Pape, S.; Rannenberg, K. and Schmitz, C.: SIDATE: Gefährdungen und Sicherheitsmassnahmen. In State of the Art: IT-Sicherheit für Kritische Infrastrukturen, pages 51, Universität der Bundeswehr, Neubiberg, 2018.
    PDFDOILinkno LinkBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

  10. Schmitz, C.; Sekula, A.; Pape, S.; Pipek, V. and Rannenberg, K.: Easing the Burden of Security Self-Assessments. In 12th International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security & Assurance, HAISA 2018 ,Dundee, Scotland, August 29-31, 2018, Proceedings., 2018.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract SSPPR18haisaBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

  11. Dax, J.; Ivan, A.; Ley, B.; Pape, S.; Pipek, V.; Rannenberg, K.; Schmitz, C. and Sekulla, A.: IT Security Status of German Energy Providers. Technical Report, Cornell University, arXiv, 2017.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract DILPPRSS17trBibtexsecuritycritical infrastructuressidate

  12. Dax, J.; Ley, B.; Pape, S.; Pipek, V.; Rannenberg, K.; Schmitz, C. and Sekulla, A.: Stand zur IT-Sicherheit deutscher Stromnetzbetreiber : technischer Bericht. Technical Report, Universität Siegen, 2017.
    PDFDOILinkno Link Abstract DLPPRSS17trBibtexsecuritycritical infrastructuressidate

  13. Dax, J.; Hamburg, D.; Kreusch, M.; Ley, B.; Pape, S.; Pipek, V.; Rannenberg, K.; Schmitz, C. and Terhaag, F.: Sichere Informationsinfrastrukturen für kleine und mittlere Energieversorger. In Multikonferenz Wirtschaftsinformatik (MKWI) -- Teilkonferenz IT-Sicherheit für Kritische Infrastrukturen (Poster), 2016.
    PDFPosterDOIno Link Abstract DHKLPPRST16mkwiBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

  14. Dax, J.; Ley, B.; Pape, S.; Schmitz, C.; Pipek, V. and Rannenberg, K.: Elicitation of Requirements for an inter-organizational Platform to Support Security Management Decisions. In 10th International Symposium on Human Aspects of Information Security & Assurance, HAISA 2016 ,Frankfurt, Germany, July 19-21, 2016, Proceedings., 2016.
    PDFDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract DLPSPR16haisaBibtexsecuritysecurity managementcritical infrastructuressidate

e-commerceE-Commerce

In the e-commerce domain, the work examines how online shopping platforms can be redesigned to minimise unnecessary data disclosure. The key contribution proposes and compares several architectural designs for a pseudonymous e-commerce platform, evaluating each against privacy threat analysis (LINDDUN), transparency, usability, and business model compatibility — demonstrating that meaningful privacy by design is achievable without abandoning existing commercial structures.
Show related bibliography:
  1. Pape, S.; Tasche, D.; Bastys, I.; Grosz, A.; Laessig, J. and Rannenberg, K.: Towards an Architecture for Pseudonymous E-Commerce -- Applying Privacy by Design to Online Shopping. In Sicherheit 2018: Sicherheit, Schutz und Zuverlässigkeit, Beiträge der 9. Jahrestagung des Fachbereichs Sicherheit der Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), 25.-27. April 2018, Konstanz, pages 17-28, 2018.
    PDFPresentation slidesDOILinkLinkLinkLink Abstract PTBGLR18sicherheitBibtexprivacypetse-commerceeconomysioc